May 19, 2008 9:01 PM PDT

Now at Napster: 6 million DRM-free MP3s

(Credit: Napster)

Probably the biggest piece of digital music news to come out of CES 2008 was that Napster was planning to offer its complete catalog of more than 6 million tracks in the unprotected MP3 format.

On Tuesday, with the launch of version 4.5 of the software and store, that announcement becomes a reality. Although digital music stores such as eMusic, Amazon MP3, and even Napster itself already had MP3s on offer before this point, the collective catalogs of all three didn't even come near the volume of tracks you can find in the entire Napster library. All four major labels and thousands of indies are represented in the store, and every track will be available at the standard 99 cent price point.

Napster's Web-based store with the online media player window open.

(Credit: Napster)


In addition, Napster's Web-based store, which is all that is required for MP3 purchases and downloads, is compatible with every operating system. And--of course--the MP3s can be played on any MP3 player, portable video player, or music cell phone. Currently, 95 percent of the catalog is encoded at 256Kbps, which is reasonably high-quality for an MP3, and each track comes with hi-resolution album art (at least 1,000x1,000 pixels). Although Napster has quite an international presence, the MP3 store will only be available to U.S. residents for the time being.

Napster will continue to offer its online and To Go subscription services for $12.95 or $14.95 per month, respectively. The music associated with a subscription will remain in the protected WMA format with the time-out capability.

The company did make some improvements to its online interface. It now features a "liquid layout," which resizes everything within both the store and media player windows when you adjust the size of either window. Napster has also improved its download management system so that users can better view what has been purchased already and whether it was ever downloaded after the purchase.

Sadly, because of label restrictions, Napster will not be offering any type of trade program for customers who have a library of DRM-protected WMA files that they purchased a la carte. However, the licenses on those files will continue to be supported by the service, so no need to worry about a repeat of the MSN Music scandal. At least not for now.

Recent posts from Crave
Yelle, 'Je Veux Te Voir': Free MP3 of the Day
Looking back, looking ahead: The week in laptops
Attention back-to-school shoppers: Find your laptop reviews here
Gear4 shrinks 'BlackBox' speaker to travel size
Review: 2009 Acura TSX
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 23 comments (Page 1 of 2)
by chillys95 May 19, 2008 10:32 PM PDT
apple has rested on their lead for too long and now other companies are out doing them. Competition is also good for the customer. And Amazon and Napster on giving Apple wat it deserves in this market-- competition. And us the consumer wat we have always deserved-- digital music wit out the music labels telling us how we can use it.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo May 20, 2008 1:23 AM PDT
Yawn...Amazon is cheaper in many cases , 89 cents and many Amazon MP3s are 320 kbps. But I`m for anything that hurts Apple. BTW...any music worth "napstering" got NAPSTERED back in 1999-2000
Reply to this comment View reply
by capiendo May 20, 2008 1:25 AM PDT
@chillys95 ...and i'll listen to Napster's music on my iPod :)
Reply to this comment
by RicD May 20, 2008 6:04 AM PDT
Hey AppleSuxLeo, "...anything that hurts Apple", such a childish comment. If it hurts Apple, it will hurt MS, IBM, GM, Ford, plus many other companies. It will hurt thousands of folks such as employees, suppliers, car manufactures, manufacturing, music industry, families of the aforementioned, it becomes truly a domino effect that may well trickle down hurting you. Be careful what you wish for you may receive it. What you're saying is you want everyone to hurt. Very childish self centered.
Reply to this comment
by asilvera4 May 20, 2008 6:37 AM PDT
MP3's sound terrible at any bit-rate. I have absolutely no regard for any company or vendor, but I do want my music to sound as good as possible. Say what you will, iTunes Plus 256K AAC's sound nearer to CD quality than most any compressed files available anywhere.
Reply to this comment
by wilbou May 20, 2008 7:43 AM PDT
This is awsome but i also want to bring to light something tht no one ever says which is that the old musicmatch tracks i purchased dont work anymore and neither yahoo or rhapsody will help me out.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo May 20, 2008 9:29 AM PDT
iTunes is/was a monopoly. Apple-lovers never see this. The monopoly is eroding as we speak thanks to Amazon. Thinking iTunes would control the music scene forever is foolish. Thanks to Amazon and their lack of DRM , better quality , and lower prices , Apple is starting to lose control and iPod sales are off also. Thank God their are alternatives to the greedy Jobs-run system.
Reply to this comment
by PunkCityKid2 May 20, 2008 10:29 AM PDT
Wow that's awesome...I can't wait to go home and DL some albums for free and not worry about any of these problems.
Reply to this comment
by da_bombdiggidy May 20, 2008 12:14 PM PDT
I have never used Napster since it went legit. I have long used iTunes and yet to find a reason to switch. My biggest curiosity would come in true standard pricing and ability to purchase any individual song without being required to purchase the album. But I would like to change the subject for a moment. This is an interesting evolution in the breakdown of piracy and distribution. However, there remains one place in this industry that remains tightly controlled and over regulated. I am still annoyed that as a media producer there is no way to use recorded content without having to jump through huge hurdles and costs. As independent productions are increasing, this seems like a grey area that deserves attention. I'm tired of stories of the RIAA suing anything that even remotely sounds like something similar. We need one place to purchase music licenses with catalogs of what is available. There should be multi artist recordings. There should be fair pricing schemes for different distribution methods and quantities. There should be easy revenue sharing built in when needed.
Reply to this comment
by RicD May 20, 2008 2:21 PM PDT
Hay "AppleSuxLeo", How is Apple greedy? The RIAA wants more than .99 cents a song Apple held the RIAA to .99 cents a song; where's the greed? It has been written in many journals that Apple doesn't make very much off each sale. The vast majority of the .99 goes to the RIAA. What does the RIAA do with the windfall of Apple sales, not share it with the artists; the artists are operate under contract; paid so much for what they produce. Because of those contacts even if the RIAA reaped all the money in the world they are not under any obligation to share a penny more with the artists. So who's greedy? It's all a contractual business. You want a raise you want more income, will you then work longer hours, more diligently, coming in earlier, etc.? If not why pay you more, D'oh. You want more income for doing the same amount of work. Hey, maybe you're the greedy one. Apple doesn't have a monopoly, by definition a monopoly: "(economics) a market in which there are many buyers but only one seller". Many others along with Apple sell songs. It's that Apple provided the best marketing plan; is that what you don't like? Yes iPod sales may have slowed a bit, your point is? Zune hasn't sold much at all. Also look at the many MP3 players that have fallen by the wayside. Though some were good people didn't want them. Don't blame Apple. Sadly you seem to relish in others misfortune.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

I Crave

advertisement
Click Here.
Crave home

Crave

Switch background color:
A Blog from CNET

A Blog from CNET

Visit other CNET Networks sites: