• On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
April 28, 2008 6:05 AM PDT

Bluetooth implants: Why not?

Question: How did the Borg--the not-so-lovable cyborgs in Star Trek--get to be that way?

Answer: it all started with Bluetooth headsets.

I see more and more people walking around with Bluetooth headsets lodged behind their ears every day. Most states are passing hands-free laws for drivers. Even my technophobe wife wants one.

I could be wrong, but I think it's only a matter of time before some enterprising startup comes up with an implantable device.

Not being a biotech guy, I'm not really equipped to judge the biological challenges of such a thing. But on the tech side, the only significant problem I can think of is designing it to be upgradeable so you don't need surgery every time the standard is updated or, God forbid, there's a new standard.

I guess a smart card slot or something similar might do the trick.

As for the demand side of the equation, here's what I'm thinking. Lots of people seem to be willing to go under the knife for elective cosmetic surgery. Who would have thought there'd be so many vain people? I've got to believe there are at least as many folks who are pragmatic, efficient and geeky to the point of undergoing a little snip snip or nip tuck or whatever they call it.

If the device is well-designed, the procedure is relatively safe, and the whole package isn't too pricey, voila, you've got a market.

And that's just the beginning. I can envision an entire line of implantable products, from Bluetooth and Wi-Fi transceivers to language translators and heads up displays. How about DC power plugs? What, you didn't know that people can generate their own electricity? Isn't that what the bad guys did with the entire human race in The Matrix?

Where will it all end? I don't know, maybe combining cosmetic surgery with techno-implants to create human advertisements. How much would it take to turn you into a walking iPhone?

Mark my words: the geeks of today will be the Borgs of tomorrow.

Originally posted at Train Wreck
Steve Tobak is managing partner of Invisor Consulting LLC. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Crave
The Streets, 'The Escapist': Free MP3 of the Day
Crooked Fingers, 'Phony Revolutions': Free MP3 of the Day
This week in Crave-land
Crave: There's a Storm a-brewing
Even more Samsung phones clear the FCC
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 19 comments
by LunarFlame17 April 28, 2008 5:00 PM PDT
I can't quite tell if this post is supposed to be ironic, but what I do know is that the prospect of having technology implanted into my body kinda freaks me out. Unless it's like, a pacemaker or something. You know, something that helps keep me alive or whatever.
Reply to this comment
by xZero2007x April 29, 2008 6:55 AM PDT
@ LunarFlame17: I totally agree with you.

As for you, Steve Tobak: I, myself am not too sure if you were trying some creative writing here or if you were really serious. As everyone is entitled to their own opinion, writers usually have a little more power than the reader, since they get to dictate what's written. And with that additional power, one needs to write carefully and fully express what he or she is trying to convey in the writing.

I don't think I'd appreciate any type of technology being built into humans like that. As a species, we're exceptionally well built already--why mock our designer (God) by adding more into our bodies?

I'm trying not to get too religious here, and I don't normally, but you could also see some spectators viewing this with a reference to Revelations in the Bible with the description of every man (who isn't saved and left behind in the rapture) being branded with the mark of the devil.

All that aside, I say keep the tech out. There's no need for us to implant ourselves with something so unnatural as this.
Reply to this comment View reply
by xZero2007x April 29, 2008 6:55 AM PDT
@ LunarFlame17: I totally agree with you.

As for you, Steve Tobak: I, myself am not too sure if you were trying some creative writing here or if you were really serious. As everyone is entitled to their own opinion, writers usually have a little more power than the reader, since they get to dictate what's written. And with that additional power, one needs to write carefully and fully express what he or she is trying to convey in the writing.

I don't think I'd appreciate any type of technology being built into humans like that. As a species, we're exceptionally well built already--why mock our designer (God) by adding more into our bodies?

I'm trying not to get too religious here, and I don't normally, but you could also see some spectators viewing this with a reference to Revelations in the Bible with the description of every man (who isn't saved and left behind in the rapture) being branded with the mark of the devil.

All that aside, I say keep the tech out. There's no need for us to implant ourselves with something so unnatural as this.
Reply to this comment
by xZero2007x April 29, 2008 6:56 AM PDT
..damn my double posting.
Reply to this comment
by rmc100 April 29, 2008 7:51 AM PDT
The technology to create an implantable Bluetooth device could be available in the next few years. Ironically, it would be in the form of a replacement "tooth." You would have one of your upper side teeth replaced with a tooth-looking implant that would allow you to talk and hear using your skull as a speaker. (if you're right-handed or left handed, you most likely would want the device on your dominant side since, oddly, most right-handed people put their Bluetooth headset in their right ear; lefties in their left ear.) You mouth would look absolutely normal. But you would have a device that would allow you to hear music, communicate and even control other Bluetooth devices by speaking commands (your computer, your TV, your wife -- OK, maybe not the last one unless she's Bluetooth compatible). You could activate and deactivate it with a voice command -- a seldom-used word like "gorgonzola,"zephyr" or "Doh!"

Now we just need to be able to "thought-text" other people and we'll never have to have a face to face conversation again!
Reply to this comment
by mconnolly09 April 29, 2008 8:11 AM PDT
You've missed an important function of Bluetooth headsets: They signal to other people that you are talking on the phone (they also signal other things regarding wealth, occupation, feelings of self-importance, etc., but that's another story). When you see someone walking down the street having an animated conversation with nobody, don't you impulsively look at his ear to see if he's wearing a little headset? How weird would it be if there were no way to tell who was crazy and who was the techie (short of--God forbid--asking)?
I also think it's kind of hilarious (kind of hilarious==mildly amusing) that the sponsored links below are advertising plastic surgery.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by kurgan2001 April 29, 2008 8:19 AM PDT
I'd actually like ocular implants with a heads up display and nanobots running around helping out my immune system and regenerating any injuries much faster.
Reply to this comment
by CramerER11 April 29, 2008 2:11 PM PDT
They already have this in Japan something you have it implanted on your tooth to talk into
Reply to this comment
by tridentpro April 29, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
Interesting, we humans have "perfect form factors," except that we implant drugs and drug delivery devices to extend and improve our lives. We wear clothes and shoes to be socially acceptable. We drive cars, because our feet don't move fast enough to get us where we need to go. We read books and Internet postings that modify the convolutions in our brains. We cut our hair, shave, bathe and in 1000 different ways, alter our bodies and minds for personal and societal benefit. I'm a little squeamish about cutting, but I'd definitely wear a bluetooth earring or stud. Current bluetooth headsets are graceless except that they beat fumbling with a cellphone when driving a pack of kids to and fro. Cellphone interfaces suck and if I could access half of my Treo's features without putting my glasses on, it would be a boon. Actually I'd go for ocular implants and ditch the glasses altogether. And oh, maybe if I could add a couple hundred terabytes to bolster my middle-aged memory, I'd consider a smart card implant. Marshall McLuhan said it in 1964. All our media and all our technology are but extensions of ourselves. Implantable tech is no different from a pair of shoes or glasses. Anyone who believes the human form factor is perfect, should stop eating, bathing, wearing clothes and taking pharmaceuticals. Everything we do or think modfies us.
"It's not just how we use the technology that concerns us.
We're also concerned about what kind of people we become when we use it."
Reply to this comment View reply
by plamffer April 29, 2008 2:24 PM PDT
I'd like a 10gb flash card with wi-fi connection in my finger! It seems so obvious I'm surprised no-one's done it yet. Why bother with carrying a usb stick? OK, so size is a problem so far - but it can't be long, can it, till we can manage this??
Reply to this comment View reply
by chuzzy April 29, 2008 3:55 PM PDT
I think it's going to be a while before people want something implanted- especially if it might become obsolete. Perhaps an entirely-in-ear device might find some popularity. Invisible, yet removable with a magnet whenever you needed to change the battery (once every 4 months)
Reply to this comment View reply
by GhostBirdofPrey April 29, 2008 4:16 PM PDT
With the collective well on its way to replacing the internet maybe we sould practice the borg mantra.

We are the Borg. Lower your shields and we will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.
Reply to this comment
by alfredo-br April 29, 2008 10:29 PM PDT
I had one such implant made some ten years ago. Although nowadays there might be more efficient ways of managing the energy issue, my gadget's battery is still ok. And, fortunately, there is no need to cut my skin every time there is a need to reprogram the device, or updating its software. A magnetic interface takes care of that. My gadget is a programmable pacemaker. A friend of mine had a similar gadget implanted to monitor her insuline level and deliver it accordingly. So, why not a hearing device? Or whatever? (By the way, I tried to resist to this imposition from the Borgs, but they put me to sleep)
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right