April 9, 2008 1:47 PM PDT

Setting the record straight: Verizon's Fios ads and CNET

A Verizon commercial implies CNET reviewed the Fios TV service, but we did not.

Verizon is running an ad implying that CNET gave its Fios TV service's picture quality a positive review, calling it "near-flawless." The reality is that a CNET Networks property did use that phrasing in a news story, not a review, and the words are taken out of context.

Adding to the confusion, CNET itself bears some of the blame.

Here's the all-important context: a series of Fios TV spots running in the New York metropolitan area and possibly elsewhere uses a couple of words clipped from a June 21, 2007, CNET News.com piece on Verizon's Fios service. The commercial flashes a quote on the screen that says "near-flawless" along with the CNET logo, while a voiceover proclaims: "Your HDTV doesn't want cable. Give it Verizon Fios, for picture quality the experts call 'near-flawless.'" Another, more-recent ad is also running with a slightly expanded logo-backed quote that reads: "A near-flawless TV experience." Check out the video, which CNET uploaded to YouTube, for the original spot.

Those words did appear on a News.com story (News.com and CNET Reviews are sister sites published by CNET Networks). But the context of the original News.com piece, titled "Verizon's fiber-optic payoff," reads quite differently from how Verizon is using it:

This fierce competition reinforces how important it is for Verizon to offer a near-flawless TV experience. Verizon's executives knew that getting that experience right would be key, and that getting it right meant making sure there was enough bandwidth on the network to deliver several streams of high-definition video at once. It also meant ensuring the service was reliable and met customers' expectations.

Nowhere does the News.com article give any opinion, implied or overt, about Fios TV's actual picture quality. And CNET Reviews has not evaluated Fios TV.

In Verizon's defense, it followed standard procedure. I spoke with Bobbi Henson, the company's media relations director, and she said that in preparation for running the ad, Verizon contacted CNET's permissions department and asked for a license to use the quote and CNET's logo for one year. Verizon received permission to use the words, but the ad execution did not get reviewed. As a result, the problem with the phrase being taken out of context was not caught.

Verizon is aware that CNET feels the quote was taken out of context, and Verizon has agreed to shorten what was formerly a year-long license. The ads will no longer appear after May 15, 2008. And CNET is taking steps to tighten up its ad-review process.

I appreciate Verizon's concession, and I realize that these things happen all the time. I just wanted to set the record straight and let you know that our experts never called Verizon Fios TV "near-flawless" as the result of any critical evaluation.

Recent posts from Crave
Super XX Man, 'Medication': Free MP3 of the Day
Review: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL550
ZvBox: Not the ultimate PC-to-TV box
New models from Asia and the best student laptops: The week in laptops
Poll: Gamer's bill of rights--is it necessary?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 16 comments
by Techno Trousers April 9, 2008 1:46 PM PDT
It's not right that Verizon took a CNET news piece out of context like that.

I've never read anything but positive comments about FiOS TV quality. In fact, it seems to be the gold standard that everyone uses as a reference comparison when complaining about the picture quality of their own provider (Comcast, Dish, DirecTV, etc.). I wish I had the option for FiOS at my home. I would most certainly give it a try.

Maybe CNET should go ahead and do a proper review of provider picture quality (including FiOS). Then, if it does actually turn out to be "near-flawless", you can resume that important ad revenue stream!
Reply to this comment
by Techno Trousers April 9, 2008 1:46 PM PDT
It's not right that Verizon took a CNET news piece out of context like that.

I've never read anything but positive comments about FiOS TV quality. In fact, it seems to be the gold standard that everyone uses as a reference comparison when complaining about the picture quality of their own provider (Comcast, Dish, DirecTV, etc.). I wish I had the option for FiOS at my home. I would most certainly give it a try.

Maybe CNET should go ahead and do a proper review of provider picture quality (including FiOS). Then, if it does actually turn out to be "near-flawless", you can resume that important ad revenue stream!
Reply to this comment
by Ksal005 April 9, 2008 2:44 PM PDT
How a review CNET? You set the record straight, now how about giving us a review of FIOS TV? I find too many outdated reviews on CNET. I wish there was a better site to review current technologies and products. Until then, I'll wait for a review on FIOS TV.
Reply to this comment
by Patriot_Nation April 9, 2008 3:32 PM PDT
Though CNET may be hesitant to review Fios, Consumer Reports had no such qualms. They rated Fios #1 in cable over Direct TV, Comcast, Charter, etc.
Reply to this comment
by phyxiusone April 9, 2008 5:27 PM PDT
If Fios is so great, why did they have to take a quote out of context for their ad? They could've gotten any other review and used it legitimately.... weird...
Reply to this comment
by kwxj61b April 10, 2008 5:13 AM PDT
Verizon claims that they are "Broadband". How could a DSL with 700k speed is a broadband when rest of the world are going more than 2x the speed of that? Verizon is ripping off all the DSL customers, they are too cheap **** to upgrade.
Would someone just boycott Verizon Broadband crap.
Reply to this comment
by supoman April 10, 2008 6:40 AM PDT
I guess you are the last person on earth to know that the current top speed of FiOS is 50mbps (both ways) and I believe they can even go twice that much with technology upgrades.
Reply to this comment
by angry jubu April 10, 2008 9:04 AM PDT
The only thing I really find offensive about the ads is that Verizon continues to market aggressively in areas in which FiOS is as yet unavailable.
Reply to this comment
by sahilk8 April 10, 2008 4:38 PM PDT
Why is CNET complaining? They are only getting free advertisement, and its CNET's fault for giving Verizon permission in the first place, obviously the person who gave them permission had no clue what Verizon wanted to use.

kwxj61b - off topic?
Reply to this comment
by fiosinstall April 10, 2008 6:43 PM PDT
Im so happy that Cnet decided to run and hide from their "stolen" and wrongly quoted words. Grow Up!!
FYI.....FIOS "IS" near flawless, For those of you who want to bash Verizon for not having service in your area you may not know that it's not as easy as it seems. First off maybe the FCC should let the company have a blanket license to enter every state withought having to go to each and every little town to ask permission. Many towns ask for baseball parks, firetrucks, upgraded streets,.....what does this have to do with competition. Let the company compete on equal ground with the cable companies and you will see them in your back yard tommorow. Go ask your Congressman that one!
Lastly......the technology is here to stay and here to last, do you know anything faster than the speed of light as far as communications??
This is not meant for any other reason except the reality of competition. Please do not take this out of context.
Reply to this comment
by qwiksillva April 11, 2008 6:02 AM PDT
Yes, nothing is faster than the speed of light, but Verizon does good marketing in making it seem like no one else is on par with that level fo technology. A lot of cable companies have been using fiber lines for over 15 years, yet Verizon boasts like it's something special. Granted Verizon hosts up to 50Mb/s but only in some major cities and the pricing for the speed is outrageous. A lot of cable companies use a HFC line (hybrid fiber coax) which is a main fiber network that branches off with coax cable to the customer's home. Cable companies are very capable of supporting those speeds, but alot of companies feel that the pricing required to offer it would be out of the market for some consumers. All cable companies also have business customer that need very high speeds for productivity purposes and they cna most certainly provide the speeds they require. In reality, Verizon is so dependent on their marketing to get them anywhere in the cable market with slightly misleading comments and tactical marketing everywhere. They depend on using quotes out of context, giving a lot of customers the false impression that they created "FiOS", that no one else can compete with their speeds of net service, and that they are the only one using "FiOS". Remember cable companies having been USING this technology and DOING it longer. Now, who are you going trust?
Reply to this comment
by fiosinstall April 11, 2008 5:34 PM PDT
So Verizon is awful for good marketing???
If the cable companies HAD all this technology and fiber than where the heck is it??
Why are they not "marketing" that way.
Verizon had to open their entire phone network to the cable companies and anyone else by court rulings. Did the cable companies have to give Verizon or anyone else access to their "cable".
That's why Verizon sunk a fortune into FIOS so it would not have to share.
Maybe it's time you cable fans face the facts and get off the monopoly free ride they have had for ever.
Quit Boo hooing and compete and.
Reply to this comment
by Yogi29035 April 13, 2008 11:49 AM PDT
The best case would have been for CNet to have not given permission in the first place- but they have acknowledged this error, and say they are fixing it.
I do agree with t hose who say that CNet should do a comparative review of the various connection options available: cable, Fios, etc. People are making decisions every day about what product to purchase, and it would be great to have CNet's opinion to consider when doing so.
Reply to this comment View reply
by GadgetGav April 13, 2008 3:35 PM PDT
Marketing materials that bend the truth..? I'm shocked, shocked I say..!
What exactly is the point of this piece..? Is CNET / Crave trying to say that the FiOS TV picture isn't "near-flawless"..? That's going to be a hard sell. Does CNET now regret allowing Verizon to use the quote and logo and are now trying to get them to pull the ad?
Reply to this comment
by jamesm11234 April 28, 2008 12:00 PM PDT
I called Verizon FIOS to order phone, internet, and cable prior to my move in. My Consumer Order Summary was dated 3-28-08, and the scheduled installation date was 4-7-08. I reviewed the e-mail and all looked well. I move into my new house and install date comes. They setup an 8 AM-noon window. I already had the Optical Network Terminal unit (ONT) in my house, so I figured this would be cake for them. I am a Sys Admin at an ISP, so the internet stuff I could do myself with ease.

On install day, no one showed, no one called. I had my mobile with me at ALL times. So around 1:30 PM I called Verizon to see what was going on. If something came up, I had a week off to move in and if they needed to come by in a day or two, I was totally cool with that. After about an hour on hold I got in touch with a ?state level? dispatcher. That said that there were ?no facilities available for my order? and I was called. Nope, I wasn?t called; they did have my cell (which I had with me all of the time) in their records. I wanted them to come out later in the week if possible since I was home. They said that their next available time for me was 4-12-08, which was a day where I was going to a wedding. The next available time after that was at the end of the month, on a work day for me.

Basically because they did not show up, or even notify me with a reason, they put me at the back of the line. I was trying to escalate my request and the support only gave me unreasonable dates and that ?no facilities available for my order? BS. I later wanted to get my copper line put back so I could at least get phone service, and after a long wait in hold they gave me the end of the month as a date. Basically I was being run around in circles and being shoved to the end of the line because Verizon screwed up my installation. I was told the only way I could get it sooner is if I ?knew an installer who?d do me a favor,? and I was pretty much screwed with the window of time I had to get the service installed. The salesperson fed me a load of bull and the installer didn?t even call me with a reason. I tried to figure out what ?no facilities available for my order? meant, and why this was such a problem since I already had the ONT in my house. Half of their work was already done.

The same day, I called a local cable company who installed my phone, internet, and cable the next day. They showed up on time and did the normal pre and post appointment verification. I unplugged the ONT in my house and let the battery go out. Verizon gave me such a lousy customer experience I swore I would never do business with them, and be sure to let other people know about their awful customer service and commitments they setup and do not honor. Verizon screwed up prior when they bought Bell Atlantic, and screwed up our perfectly find DSL service I had around 98/99. My money is going to a competitor, and Verizon won?t see it because they have abysmal customer service. I am certainly interested in fiber optic lines connected to my house, but so long as Verizon is the only provider, I will happily do without.

James
Herndon, VA
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right