January 15, 2008 5:23 PM PST

Will iPod movie rentals take off?

Photo of iPod Homer Simpson silhouette.

Video rental comes to the iPod. Can Apple finally make download video rental succeed for a portable device?

(Credit: Daniel Terdiman/CNET News.com)

From an iPod perspective, the biggest announcement from Macworld 2008 has to be iTunes video rentals. Beginning in February, those of you who own an iPhone, iPod Classic, iPod Touch, or 3G iPod Nano, will be able to rent and transfer movies from iTunes. iTunes movie rentals will be priced at $3.99 for new releases and $2.99 for older titles. While I'll have to wait and see how well renting movies in iTunes works, at first glance this looks like a huge win for the iPod.

Only a few competing MP3 players have dipped their toes into integrated video rental services. Specifically, the Archos line of portable video players and the Samsung YP-P2 have an arrangement with CinemaNow, which allows identically-priced movie rentals. While Apple might not be the first to pioneer DRM-protected movie rentals, no one has pulled it off at this scale. The built-in audience of iTunes users and iPod owners provides a staggering amount of leverage for Apple to completely change the way people rent and watch movies. But will it really stick?

From my point of view, Apple's video rental DRM strategy is a big roadblock to people renting movies specifically for their iPod. Apple's rental terms afford users 30 days to decide when to watch their downloaded movie rental, and then 24 hours to finish watching it after the movie has started. For users who are renting movies to watch at home, Apple's rental terms seem adequate, if a little stingy. At home, most of us are free from distraction and will have no problem consuming a movie within 24 hours of starting it. On a portable device, however, I predict that the 24-hour limitation will be very frustrating.

Unless I'm on a transcontinental flight, I have a tough time getting through a full movie on a portable video player. I usually watch half of a movie on the departure flight and half on the return--a scenario that wouldn't work with Apple's proposed DRM scheme. Apple's PR representatives at Macworld touted the ability to start a rented movie on a computer or Apple TV, and later transfer the video to an iPod to finish it on the go. While I'm happy Apple's rental DRM-protection doesn't hamper the transfer of movies between devices, the idea of rushing to finish last night's movie on my morning commute seems needlessly stressful.

Why can't Apple's movie rental DRM simply allow users one complete play of the movie, digested in as many small doses as needed, within a 30-day period? Wouldn't that be a more user-friendly approach? What advantage does the 24-hour restriction afford Apple? Whatever money Apple makes from customers renting a movie twice because the DRM expired, can't be worth the frustration it causes the user.

So what do you guys think? Will an iTunes movie rental make it onto your iPod in the near future, or will the DRM make renting strictly an at-home activity? If Apple's offer isn't perfect, what would seal the deal for you?

Originally posted at MP3 Insider
Recent posts from Crave
Poll: Seinfeld and Vista, what gives?
Review: 2008 Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring
Dish Network's new TR-40 DTV converter box: Same as the DTVPal, but $20 less
Cutting edge: MP3 players with built-in WiFi
First impression on Thecus N3200 NAS device
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 4 comments (Page 1 of 1)
I have to disagree with your opinion
by Chewbacca_il January 15, 2008 9:26 PM PST
Your Idea about viewing the movies in small dosages over a 30 day period is much more difficult to implement and, in my opinion equally frustrating. It basically means that you don't have a rewind function (otherwise you would be able to see it many times over the same period) what if you are distracted and missed the "Pause" button, that's it? You can't go back to view the part you missed?
I think this sort of policy will cause Apple to miss a view customers, I wouldn't order a movie unless I knew with as much certianty as I can, that I will be able to view it in the next 24 hours, which is probably why I wouldn't get one for my iPod unless I have a long fligh ahad of me....
Reply to this comment
Seems too be a bit pricey
by WheelerCub January 16, 2008 4:41 PM PST
The price Apple wants to charge for movies seems a bit high considering that people can currently get a better deal with Netflix or Blockbuster Online. Plus those services let you hold on to a movie as long as you like for no additional charge. I would think that if they change the price to $1.99 or lower, it may be worth it however.
Reply to this comment
Digital Rentals will not compete with Disc rentals
by roguepuppet January 16, 2008 4:51 PM PST
..at least not as long as they have draconian playback limits on the digital downloads for rentals. I live in a household with 4 kids, 2 adults, a handful of kids who often stay over and a couple of adults who frequently hang out. We Love Netflix, but I would go digital download in a heartbeat if I could make it work. There are more computers than people in the house most days, and a couple of video iPods.
On rare occaisions, we get everyone to sit down and watch a movie all together-one time. Even when we do, if it is good- the younger ones will want to watch it again the next morning. More often one or more of the teens is out ( date, friends, practise) and want to watch the movie some time later in the weekend. Friends stop by: "Wait, you HAVE to see this movie", it gets played again. Friends sleep over, discs get taken to the family room in the basement and watched over and over into the wee hours. We can keep a Netflix Disc only 3 days and it can easily get played 4-10 times. Sometime we (gasp) keep a Netflix disc as long as a week to give everyone a shot at it.
A system where you pay 4 bucks to watch a movie one time? Never going to fly around here. Why not simplify the programming and make this more appealing. Just put a time limit on the rental- you can download and play the movie to your heart's content for 2 weeks. As many times as you want, in as many pieces as you want, on as many players as you want. As soon as you hit the 2 week limit, it no longer plays.

http://roguepuppet.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
Seems like an expesive rip off.
by jacksos February 14, 2008 8:47 PM PST
Apple will be forced to artificially limit supply of $10 ipod movie purchases, Disney style. DVD ripping will become even more common, and Apple will have to crack down on home ripped .mp4s. Apple + iTunes will become no better than Microsoft and the recording industry, losing there soul to the $$$, desperately scrambling for the user's rapidly shrinking disposable income. Maybe they can make a deal with Yahoo and China to sell our contact information for $0.99 a head!
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

I Crave

advertisement
Crave home

Crave

Switch background color:
A Blog from CNET

A Blog from CNET

Visit other CNET Networks sites: