October 5, 2007 10:53 AM PDT

Sony confirms cheaper 40GB PS3 for Europe; U.S. version to follow?

40GB Sony PlayStaton 3 (PS3)

The new 40GB PS3: Are the compromises worth the reduced price tag?

(Credit: Sony Computer Entertainment Europe)


The rumors were true, almost to the letter. Sony Europe has confirmed the existence of a new entry-level PlayStation 3. Scheduled to hit stores on the Continent on October 10, the new PS3 has been stripped down to hit a lower price point: it's got a smaller 40GB hard drive, no built-in flash media reader, and two (rather than four) USB ports. But the biggest change appears to be the loss of backward compatibility with PS2 games. Sony's release specifies that "[t]he new model is no longer backwards compatible with PlayStation 2 titles, reflecting both the reduced emphasis placed on this feature amongst later purchasers of PS3, as well as the availability of a more extensive lineup of PS3 specific titles (a total of 65 titles across all genres by Christmas)." That seems to counter conventional wisdom, since the newer PS3s were already said to be using software emulation (rather than an actual PS2 Emotion Engine chip) to play older games. In brighter news, the new PS3s retain Blu-ray playback, HDMI output, and onboard Wi-Fi.

The 40GB PS3 will retail for £300 in the U.K. and €400 across continental Europe. The existing 60GB PS3--which retains backwards compatibility--remains on the market with a price cut and a new bundle as well. There's no official word for those of us outside Europe, but it's a safe bet that PS3 sales in North America will crawl to a standstill as consumers wait for the other price-cut shoe to drop on this side of the Pond. The expected price tag will be $400--a huge bargain, considering the current weakness of the American dollar.

Of course, the PS3 had already seen a de facto price cut to $500 just a few months ago, but the PS3 has yet to generate a Halo-like hit for hardcore gamers or connect with mainstream audiences like the red-hot (and much cheaper) Nintendo Wii. Despite a couple of recent hits (Warhawk, Heavenly Sword), With keystone exclusives such as Metal Gear Solid 4 and now Unreal Tournament III pushed back to 2008, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune seems to be the only hotly anticipated PS3 exclusive slated to hit this fall. In short, Sony needs to generate some excitement in the meantime, and the prospect of a $400 PS3 just in time for the holidays sounds like a perfect recipe. Whether or not the backward compatibility issue will sour the deal remains to be seen.

What do you think: is the (presumably imminent) PS3 worth $400, or is the dearth of backward compatibility a deal breaker?

Recent posts from Crave
Yelle, 'Je Veux Te Voir': Free MP3 of the Day
Looking back, looking ahead: The week in laptops
Attention back-to-school shoppers: Find your laptop reviews here
Gear4 shrinks 'BlackBox' speaker to travel size
Review: 2009 Acura TSX
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 16 comments (Page 1 of 2)
One more time...
by navsimpson October 5, 2007 11:52 AM PDT
I get why 14 year old forum posters are saying "if it's software emulation, why did they take it out" - after all, they don't know any better - but why are professionals saying the same thing? The PS3's emulation of PS2 games requires the PS2's graphics chip, as there is no way to replicate the extremely fast EDRAM on the PS3's RSX GPU. While you can take out the PS2's CPU, the same can't be said for the graphics chip - that's why these new models are not backwards compatible. It was obviously a cost-cutting measure and will probably end up being the right choice.
Reply to this comment
One more time...
by navsimpson October 5, 2007 11:52 AM PDT
I get why 14 year old forum posters are saying "if it's software emulation, why did they take it out" - after all, they don't know any better - but why are professionals saying the same thing? The PS3's emulation of PS2 games requires the PS2's graphics chip, as there is no way to replicate the extremely fast EDRAM on the PS3's RSX GPU. While you can take out the PS2's CPU, the same can't be said for the graphics chip - that's why these new models are not backwards compatible. It was obviously a cost-cutting measure and will probably end up being the right choice.
Reply to this comment
Exclusives
by Perry L October 5, 2007 12:02 PM PDT
First: Ratchet and Clank is out in a few weeks. That game is bigger than uncharted. Second: Who cares if a game is exclusive? I sold my 360. If a game is on PS3 and 360, I'll obviously be getting the PS3 version. Sure, I would love to play Bioshock and Mass Effect but not enough to buy another 360. Maybe when the 360 is $100 and the exclsuive games are $20 each in a few years, but not now.
Reply to this comment
Exclusives
by Perry L October 5, 2007 12:02 PM PDT
First: Ratchet and Clank is out in a few weeks. That game is bigger than uncharted. Second: Who cares if a game is exclusive? I sold my 360. If a game is on PS3 and 360, I'll obviously be getting the PS3 version. Sure, I would love to play Bioshock and Mass Effect but not enough to buy another 360. Maybe when the 360 is $100 and the exclsuive games are $20 each in a few years, but not now.
Reply to this comment
Lack of Backwards Compatability Unwise
by j_powell October 5, 2007 12:52 PM PDT
There is an enormous base of PS2 users out there. Furthermore you can still buy a PS2 and PS2 software, so that installed base continues to expand. Providing a clean upgrade path to existing users makes a lot of sense - they can upgrade to the new generation hardware without losing the investment in their current games. However, if the PS3 no longer plays PS2 games, then that incentive goes out the window and PS2 users might just upgrade to an XBox 360. I own a PS2 and one of the main reasons I wanted to go the PS3 route when I upgrade is that it would play my extensive library of existing games. I don't want two consoles in my family room, just one. But if that incentive for the PS3 disappears, I might go XBox.
Reply to this comment
Lack of Backwards Compatability Unwise
by j_powell October 5, 2007 12:52 PM PDT
There is an enormous base of PS2 users out there. Furthermore you can still buy a PS2 and PS2 software, so that installed base continues to expand. Providing a clean upgrade path to existing users makes a lot of sense - they can upgrade to the new generation hardware without losing the investment in their current games. However, if the PS3 no longer plays PS2 games, then that incentive goes out the window and PS2 users might just upgrade to an XBox 360. I own a PS2 and one of the main reasons I wanted to go the PS3 route when I upgrade is that it would play my extensive library of existing games. I don't want two consoles in my family room, just one. But if that incentive for the PS3 disappears, I might go XBox.
Reply to this comment
Good move sony
by brandonh33 October 5, 2007 2:41 PM PDT
First of all, I have never used my memory card reader on my ps3, it was more of a gimmick. And the people who want to use the ps3 for ps2 games too also have a ps2, so why not just use both consoles? $400 is an incredible deal, I honestly cant believe it. The system is now in the 360's price zone, I just wish more people would realize how incredible the ps3's are all priced compared to the 360. Seriously dont just look at the base price!
Reply to this comment
Good move sony
by brandonh33 October 5, 2007 2:41 PM PDT
First of all, I have never used my memory card reader on my ps3, it was more of a gimmick. And the people who want to use the ps3 for ps2 games too also have a ps2, so why not just use both consoles? $400 is an incredible deal, I honestly cant believe it. The system is now in the 360's price zone, I just wish more people would realize how incredible the ps3's are all priced compared to the 360. Seriously dont just look at the base price!
Reply to this comment
So Stupid, where do I begin?
by c.Lake October 11, 2007 9:11 PM PDT
With no really good games out for the PS3, backwards compatibility is all I care about. Great, you made it cheaper, but what good is it to me now that I need to have 2 systems. Nice job on rewarding customer loyalty, oh wait... If Sony hadn't put the freakin' Blu-ray into begin with, there wouldn't be this struggle on "where to reduce the cost", Duh. And before anyone starts in on that crap about "but it's the cheapest Blu-Ray player, bluh, bluh, bluh". There has to be movies that are released on Blu-Ray in order to play them on a Blu- Ray player. I mean, movies that don't suck. ex: Ultraviolent, get real --- where the hell is LORD OF THE RINGS?!?! Or HARRY POTTER?!?!? Or HD Music Concerts!?!? You know the kind of stuff a person would WANT to see on HD, and would be willing to shell out $35 bucks for, (Not "Click", or any other retarded comedy I can see for $7.50 on DVD) Come on, does this really have to be mentioned? Monkeys run Sony.
Reply to this comment
So Stupid, where do I begin?
by c.Lake October 11, 2007 9:11 PM PDT
With no really good games out for the PS3, backwards compatibility is all I care about. Great, you made it cheaper, but what good is it to me now that I need to have 2 systems. Nice job on rewarding customer loyalty, oh wait... If Sony hadn't put the freakin' Blu-ray into begin with, there wouldn't be this struggle on "where to reduce the cost", Duh. And before anyone starts in on that crap about "but it's the cheapest Blu-Ray player, bluh, bluh, bluh". There has to be movies that are released on Blu-Ray in order to play them on a Blu- Ray player. I mean, movies that don't suck. ex: Ultraviolent, get real --- where the hell is LORD OF THE RINGS?!?! Or HARRY POTTER?!?!? Or HD Music Concerts!?!? You know the kind of stuff a person would WANT to see on HD, and would be willing to shell out $35 bucks for, (Not "Click", or any other retarded comedy I can see for $7.50 on DVD) Come on, does this really have to be mentioned? Monkeys run Sony.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

I Crave

advertisement
Click Here.
Crave home

Crave

Switch background color:
A Blog from CNET

A Blog from CNET

Visit other CNET Networks sites: