August 7, 2007 1:22 PM PDT

Summer of the ultraportable laptop

It's no secret that we have a soft spot for supersmall laptops. Ultraportables, as they're called, generally have 11- or 12-inch screens and weigh in at less than four pounds--perfect for lugging around all day or hanging at the local coffee shop with. Unfortunately, these guys are usually plagued by the twin devils of high prices and poor battery life (not to mention occasionally underpowered processors).

The Sony VAIO TZ150

This, however, has clearly been the summer of the ultraportable, with a generous handful of exciting new systems generating heavy buzz. But with all these new choices, which one is right for you?

First, we have Sony's VAIO TZ150-- we loved pretty much everything about this 11.1-inch laptop, which is less than an inch thick and weighs less than three pounds. Well, everything except the $2,299 starting price and somewhat sluggish performance (which we were able to improve by uninstalling a bunch of junkware).

Neck-and-neck was our most wanted laptop of the year, Toshiba's Portege R500. A bit larger than the Sony, and with a bigger 12.1-inch screen, it was actually slightly lighter and thinner. So light that one of our colleagues picked it up and asked if it was a dummy model.

The Toshiba Portege R500

Both of these systems include optical drives, which is something we wouldn't have seen in a laptop this size in past years. Both also offer excellent battery life, which is perhaps the most important thing for computing on the go.

Sadly, the Sony and Toshiba ultraportables range from $2,000 to $3,000 depending on options, including solid state flash hard drives, which are cool, but still way too expensive to be practical. If you're looking for a supersmall laptop without a supersize price, we managed to find a few slightly less flashy options. Averatec makes a handful of ultraportable systems that offer surprisingly good value for the money. You'll sacrifice the sub-one-inch designs and some battery life, but the company's 11.1-inch Averatec 1579 is $1,299, while the 12.1-inch, AMD-powered 2371 starts at $899, making it the cheapest ultraportable we can think of.

The Averatec 1579

Of course, all this info is useless if you're buying a laptop on the company dime and The Man won't let you get one of these snazzy consumer systems. HP has a pretty good new ultraportable, the HP Compaq 2510p, from their corporate line. It's still around $2,000 for a decent configuration, and the battery life is poor, but it adds security-friendly features such as hard-drive encryption.

There you have it, five new ultraportable laptops for the summer, with something for almost every budget. For a more detailed breakdown, check out our side-by-side comparison here.

Recent posts from Crave
Picture this: Four new Samsung digital photo frames
Sony shafts Motion JPEG, takes new DSC-T500 high-def with MPEG4 AVC/H.264
Inside CNET Labs 10.5: Sometimes it's ok to drink wine alone people!
Logitech Squeezebox Boom: The ultimate Wi-Fi radio?
New binoculars make the most of mirage
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 5 comments
There is a while other segment for much cheaper...
by The Technonaut August 7, 2007 3:09 PM PDT
You guys missed a whole segment of the ultraportable market, one that I find much more exciting: the sub $500 range. Check 'em out:

http://blog.thetechnonaut.com/?p=150
Reply to this comment
Guesses on the first ultraportable gaming rig?
by xmodal August 7, 2007 4:03 PM PDT
Crew,

Dell's XPS 1330 comes close to being an actual ultra-portable gaming rig. A few years ago, the idea would have been ridiculous. But we play our hand-held DS systems, we run our notebooks out to big monitors and TVs, and (thanks to Dell) we know real, live video cards can go in super thin rigs. So how long until someone -- say, Alienware, where battery life is always a non-concern on laptops anyway -- pulls a gaming-capable ultra onto the market? Granted, it would never compete with actual gaming rigs. But if we could do all our office work and still hook in to our MMORPGs ... say on the new airline wireless services on cross-country flights ...
Reply to this comment
Thin and light...
by XSportSeeker August 7, 2007 5:37 PM PDT
Ultraportables are nice, and sexy, and everytime I see one I want to buy it.
But when you think about it, it's a better option to get laptops just a bit bigger for less, and with more bang for your buck.
Like commenter #1 already said... Dell's XPS M1330 is looking really good. At 13.3", you'll probably pay less, and get discreet graphics, better processor speed and RAM, and last but not least, bigger screen.

Screen size usually is a very personal thing. I'm kinda going blind here, so a screen smaller than 13" is hard... laptop has to be really close.

An alternative for Dell's is Sony Vaio SZ series. And if you want something even smaller, there's also Sony UX...
Reply to this comment
While the m1330 is all the buzz...
by chrispgriffin August 8, 2007 12:55 PM PDT
I never would understand why anyone would buy a vaio, they are so overpriced (like all other Sony's) and they really aren't any different than any cheaper brand. I do like the m1330, but I got my m1210 a month ago and it is fantastic. All I need, beautiful screen, Core 2 Duo, 4 usb ports, and, unlike the m1330, media buttons on the front (just a personal pref).
Reply to this comment
Lame, imcomplete, uncritical review
by bdwelle August 8, 2007 4:24 PM PDT
This is the sort of lame review that really bugs me. I see the teaser, "ultraportable laptops of your dreams", and click through to read a cursory overview of a few machines, none of which the reviewer is all that positive about. Among others, the reviewer leaves out what is in my opinion the best ultraportable on the market, the Thinkpad X61 -- an opinion with which CNet's own editors seem to agree: http://reviews.cnet.com/4323-6527_7-6509056.html?tag=txt -- and also fails entirely to address the question of whether an optical drive is an asset at all on an ultraportable machine when it adds cost and weight is so rarely used.

Overall, this sort of review smacks of amateurism and serves to do more harm than good in giving uncritical exposure to sub-par products in the guise of an informed, objective "review". Please, you guys can do better than this.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right