Pie charts indicate Blu-ray victory over HD DVD assured

A taste of humble pie for HD DVD?
(Credit: Pixel Perfect Productions)If a picture's worth a thousand words, a pie chart has to be worth at least 500. Well, Ken Pierce over at Pixel Perfect Productions has cooked up five pie charts' worth of data on why the HD DVD/Blu-ray war is over--and as James Carville would say, it's all about the content, stupid.
To give credit where credit is due, I first noticed this link in Bill Hunt's "My Two Cents" column on Digital Bits. (Sorry, the item was from a couple of days ago, but I've been on vacation). Says Hunt: "Ken's looked at the biggest films of the last few years and calculated the percentages of those films, by studio grosses, that are available for release on each format. It's called By The Numbers, and you'll find it in Ken's Random Thoughts blog over at the Pixel Perfect Web site."
Pierce goes through the top grossing films of 2005, 2006, 2007 (so far), as well as the top 100 grossing films of all time. For 2007, for example, he says, "Of the top 100 2007 (YTD) films, 47 are from Blu-ray exclusive studios, 14 are HD DVD exclusive studios, 29 are dual-format studios and 10 are not supporting either format currently." The rest of the pies look pretty similar. I don't care who wins, but those charts have to be pretty scary-looking if you're an HD DVD supporter.
- Topics:
-
Televisions,
-
Home,
-
Home video
- Tags:
-
Blu-ray,
-
HD DVD,
-
Toshiba,
-
Sony,
-
HD format war
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us


- This is useless information!!!
-
by nvisionmd
July 7, 2007 2:45 PM PDT
- I just read this article and was completely blown away at the niavity of the writer. First and formeost, this is entirely speculative information as there is no way someone can say that because the movies did so well at the box office that it will also perform as well on the home market. Also lets look at the last few years in movie studios. Seems like Sony has planned this out from the very beginning, acquiring movie house after movie house. Why? (and this is speculative by myself) Sony already knew that the war was imminent therefore by buying up all the studios ensuring that they could close the doors on Toshiba and HD-DVD. If i remember back a few years, Microsoft was shot down as trying to monopolise the computer industry by doing just was Sony is doing today. Why is it all right for Sony to get away with it but not Microsoft? Next, i'm all for more storage myself and admit that the current formats show Blu-ray as higher capacity by 15GB nonetheless. If so then why are we constantly seeing movie releases without any extra content? With all that storage i would figure that all the special feature, commentaries, audio tracks would be present. NOT. So tell me what good 50GB is? At least on the HD-DVD side of things we're seeing loads of features, extras, etc... on almost 100% of HD-DVD's? Finally, lets look at Blockbuster fiasco. For starters, blockbuster has carried BOTH formats now for almost a year in 293 stores throughout the U.S. Those stores must keep there rental and sales agreements with HD-DVD regardless of the Blu-ray deal. Also note that withing the last 6 months, Blockbuster has closed more than 250 stores in the U.S.. Oh yeah, and just last week they released a statement in which they plan to close an additional 232 stores by this years end. Well that can't possibly be a good thing for either formats but shows you at what level of desperation the Blu-ray camp is actually in.
On a final note i'd just like to state my belief in the Blockbuster Conspiracy as i see it. Sony owns 6-8 of the major movie houses. Blockbuster inventory is comprised of close to 69% of movies made by these Sony affiliated studios. So lets say that Sony wants Blu-ray domination, if i were Sony i would approach BB and basically force them to choose Blu-ray over HD-DVD or else! Or else what you ask? Or else the cost of any future titles you buy from us will be at this new HIGHER price. OR you can stock Blu-ray and we'll cut you in.
Let everyone think that one over.
Neil
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next 10 Comments >>